0.06/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.32	% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
0.13/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.32	% CPULimit   : 960
0.13/0.32	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.32	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 03:04:26 EDT 2022
0.13/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.45	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.17/0.45	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.17/0.45	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.17/0.45	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNSFN.
0.17/0.45	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.45	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.45	# Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.45	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.45	# Starting lpo1_def_fix with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.45	# sh5l with pid 24190 completed with status 0
0.17/0.45	# Result found by sh5l
0.17/0.45	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNSFN.
0.17/0.45	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.45	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.45	# Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.45	# SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.17/0.45	# ...ProofStateSinE()=5/14
0.17/0.45	# Search class: HUUNF-FFSF32-DSFFMFBN
0.17/0.45	# partial match(4): HGUNF-FFSF32-SFFFMFNN
0.17/0.45	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.17/0.45	# Starting new_ho_10 with 73s (1) cores
0.17/0.45	# new_ho_10 with pid 24193 completed with status 0
0.17/0.45	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.17/0.45	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNSFN.
0.17/0.45	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.45	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.45	# Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.45	# SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.17/0.45	# ...ProofStateSinE()=5/14
0.17/0.45	# Search class: HUUNF-FFSF32-DSFFMFBN
0.17/0.45	# partial match(4): HGUNF-FFSF32-SFFFMFNN
0.17/0.45	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.17/0.45	# Starting new_ho_10 with 73s (1) cores
0.17/0.45	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.17/0.45	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.17/0.45	
0.17/0.45	# Proof found!
0.17/0.45	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.45	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_22, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_23, type, subset: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_24, type, kpair: $i > $i > $i).
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_25, type, cartprod: $i > $i > $i).
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_26, type, breln: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_27, type, dpsetconstr: $i > $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_28, type, breln1: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_29, type, setOfPairsIsBReln1: $o).
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_30, type, breln1compset: $i > $i > $i > $i).
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_31, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_32, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.17/0.45	thf(decl_33, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.17/0.45	thf(breln1, axiom, ((breln1)=(^[X1:$i, X4:$i]:((breln @ X1 @ X1 @ X4)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', breln1)).
0.17/0.45	thf(breln, axiom, ((breln)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:((subset @ X3 @ (cartprod @ X1 @ X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', breln)).
0.17/0.45	thf(setOfPairsIsBReln1, axiom, ((setOfPairsIsBReln1)<=>![X1:$i, X5:$i > $i > $o]:((breln1 @ X1 @ (dpsetconstr @ X1 @ X1 @ (^[X6:$i, X7:$i]:((X5 @ X6 @ X7))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', setOfPairsIsBReln1)).
0.17/0.45	thf(breln1compset, axiom, ((breln1compset)=(^[X1:$i, X4:$i, X8:$i]:(dpsetconstr @ X1 @ X1 @ (^[X6:$i, X7:$i]:(?[X9:$i]:((((in @ X9 @ X1)&(in @ (kpair @ X6 @ X9) @ X4))&(in @ (kpair @ X9 @ X7) @ X8)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', breln1compset)).
0.17/0.45	thf(breln1compprop, conjecture, ((setOfPairsIsBReln1)=>![X1:$i, X4:$i]:((![X8:$i]:(((breln1 @ X1 @ (breln1compset @ X1 @ X4 @ X8))<=(breln1 @ X1 @ X8)))<=(breln1 @ X1 @ X4)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', breln1compprop)).
0.17/0.45	thf(c_0_5, plain, ((breln1)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(((subset @ Z1 @ (cartprod @ Z0 @ Z0)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[breln1])).
0.17/0.45	thf(c_0_6, plain, ((breln)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i, Z2:$i]:((subset @ Z2 @ (cartprod @ Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[breln])).
0.17/0.45	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((setOfPairsIsBReln1)<=>![X1:$i, X5:$i > $i > $o]:((breln1 @ X1 @ (dpsetconstr @ X1 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[setOfPairsIsBReln1])).
0.17/0.45	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((breln1)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(((subset @ Z1 @ (cartprod @ Z0 @ Z0)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
0.17/0.45	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((breln1compset)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i, Z2:$i]:(dpsetconstr @ Z0 @ Z0 @ (^[Z3:$i, Z4:$i]:(?[X9:$i]:((((in @ X9 @ Z0)&(in @ (kpair @ Z3 @ X9) @ Z1))&(in @ (kpair @ X9 @ Z4) @ Z2)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[breln1compset])).
0.17/0.45	thf(c_0_10, plain, ((setOfPairsIsBReln1)=(![X1:$i, X5:$i > $i > $o]:(((subset @ (dpsetconstr @ X1 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1)))) @ (cartprod @ X1 @ X1)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
0.17/0.45	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~((![X15:$i, X16:$i > $i > $o]:((subset @ (dpsetconstr @ X15 @ X15 @ (^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:((X16 @ Z0 @ Z1)))) @ (cartprod @ X15 @ X15)))=>![X1:$i, X4:$i]:(((subset @ X4 @ (cartprod @ X1 @ X1))=>![X8:$i]:(((subset @ X8 @ (cartprod @ X1 @ X1))=>(subset @ (dpsetconstr @ X1 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(?[X17:$i]:((((in @ X17 @ X1)&(in @ (kpair @ Z0 @ X17) @ X4))&(in @ (kpair @ X17 @ Z1) @ X8)))))) @ (cartprod @ X1 @ X1)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[breln1compprop]), c_0_8]), c_0_9]), c_0_10])])).
0.17/0.45	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X18:$i, X19:$i > $i > $o]:(((subset @ (dpsetconstr @ X18 @ X18 @ (^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:((X19 @ Z0 @ Z1)))) @ (cartprod @ X18 @ X18))&((subset @ esk2_0 @ (cartprod @ esk1_0 @ esk1_0))&((subset @ esk3_0 @ (cartprod @ esk1_0 @ esk1_0))&~(subset @ (dpsetconstr @ esk1_0 @ esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(?[X17:$i]:((((in @ X17 @ esk1_0)&(in @ (kpair @ Z0 @ X17) @ esk2_0))&(in @ (kpair @ X17 @ Z1) @ esk3_0)))))) @ (cartprod @ esk1_0 @ esk1_0)))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])])).
0.17/0.45	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~((subset @ (dpsetconstr @ esk1_0 @ esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(?[X23:$i]:((((in @ X23 @ esk1_0)&(in @ (kpair @ Z0 @ X23) @ esk2_0))&(in @ (kpair @ X23 @ Z1) @ esk3_0)))))) @ (cartprod @ esk1_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.17/0.45	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $i > $o, X1:$i]:((subset @ (dpsetconstr @ X1 @ X1 @ X5) @ (cartprod @ X1 @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.17/0.45	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.45	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.45	# Parsed axioms                        : 14
0.17/0.45	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 9
0.17/0.45	# Initial clauses                      : 4
0.17/0.45	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.17/0.45	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
0.17/0.45	# Processed clauses                    : 8
0.17/0.45	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.17/0.45	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.17/0.45	# ...remaining for further processing  : 8
0.17/0.45	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.17/0.45	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.45	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.17/0.45	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.17/0.45	# Generated clauses                    : 1
0.17/0.45	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
0.17/0.45	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.45	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.17/0.45	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.17/0.45	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.45	# NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.45	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.17/0.45	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.45	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.45	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.45	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.45	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.45	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.45	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.45	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.45	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.45	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.45	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.45	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.45	# Current number of processed clauses  : 4
0.17/0.45	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
0.17/0.45	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.45	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.17/0.45	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.17/0.45	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.17/0.45	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.17/0.45	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.45	# Current number of archived clauses   : 4
0.17/0.45	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.17/0.45	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.17/0.45	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.17/0.45	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.17/0.45	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.45	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.17/0.45	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.17/0.45	# Condensation attempts                : 8
0.17/0.45	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.45	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 671
0.17/0.45	
0.17/0.45	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.45	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.17/0.45	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.17/0.45	# Total time               : 0.004 s
0.17/0.45	# Maximum resident set size: 1808 pages
0.17/0.45	
0.17/0.45	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.45	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.17/0.45	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.17/0.45	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.17/0.45	# Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
0.17/0.46	EOF